By Dark Politricks
At the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it seemed that some sense prevailed among Western leaders not to engage fully in the war if it led to a full-blown NATO v Russian world war.
However as the war progressed, and as hopeless “battlefield” experts kept claiming that Russia was on the defence and almost at the point of being beaten. Claims that if only more weapons could get into Ukrainian hands, then the war’s tide could turn, got louder and louder.
The fact that it is actually a proxy war being run by the US and NATO members from the western parts of Ukraine, which they seem to be able to enter and leave by whim, is a fact left out of many people’s news on Ukraine’s fight with Russia.
Whilst it may have been a strong and proud Ukraine, led by the actor Zelenskyy, who wanted to win the war with Russia. It is actually the west, NATO, the US, and UK, who are directing the Ukrainian forces from their bases on the edges of the country. A fact that has not gone amiss by Putin and one that has been broadcast many times, for anyone who wants to know the full truth about the invasion.
This is just one report from a French journalist who went to Ukraine only to find out it was a war being run by NATO and the US, not Ukraine!
This is a foolish analysis of the war as many experts have claimed, to the deaf ears of those who pin flags to their Twitter accounts, and are proud “to be with Ukraine” – whatever that means.
Does it mean to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, as the country is split into two, with the Donbass and everything East of Odessa to become Russian, and a western husk left for any returning Ukrainians?
Does it mean to pour more and more heavy weaponry into the country, despite the US not knowing where or even caring where it ends up. From one analysis, only 10% of all western arms are getting anywhere near the battlefields as Russian intelligence allows them in only to blow up incoming western imports, as well as foreign legion training centres. They also blow up the railroads that would be needed to allow the transport of the arms eastwards where they are needed.
Just a few hours ago on Ukrainian TV it was reported that Russia had hit a “hangar full of European and US weapons”. Putin also claimed that “all objectives will be met” as he warns of “lightning fast” retaliation against any country that interferes.
Also, recently, Russia warned the UK of an immediate and “proportional response” if it continues direct provocation of Ukraine and warning of the likelihood of nuclear war if NATO members continue to interfere in the war.
Also, a former head of the Polish army has accused Boris Johnson of “tempting evil” by revealing that Ukrainian soldiers were being trained in Poland in how to use British anti-aircraft missiles before returning with them to Ukraine. Gen Waldemar Skrzypczak, also a former junior defence minister, complained that a loose-lipped prime minister had revealed too much to the Russians and that his remarks risked the safety of the soldiers involved.
So more money and western weaponry go down the Ukrainian drain, and we are stupid to think that the Russians would not be able to detect and destroy any heavy weapons we try to smuggle into the country.
All the western meddling of sending SAS saboteurs into Lviv, Ukraine, and NATO, who is really running the war, commanding Ukrainian attacks into Russia, is only making the day that a proxy war in which we are indebting Ukraine for decades to western banks whilst filling the coffers of the MIC, turns into a full-blown war.
As RT is banned in most places, I have screenshotted their latest headline piece which warns of a nuclear conflict if we continue to fight Russia through Ukraine.
So does standing with Ukraine mean allowing ourselves to be turned into shadows on the pavement due to our political leader’s long-held desire to fight Russia?
Their new Satan2 missile has already been shown off to warn us that they can hit us anywhere on earth, defeating any anti-missile defences, and turn a small country like the UK into atomic dust instantly.
Does it mean to stand with the AZOV NAZI brigade, a term that was in all Western media before the war, but now excuses are made for their views, despite training videos of them all over social media appearing with NAZI symbols on their coats as they get trained by western forces.
Does it mean to stand with a definitely non-democratic society as Ukraine plainly is?
A corrupt political society that has been infected with racist ideology to the point that even the Jewish President is following the orders of Right-Wing, anti-semites, as he bans all other political parties, imprisons political leaders, prevents free speech and denies Russian speakers in the east basic human rights as even, ex Presidential candidate and serving US medic Tulsi Gabbard tweeted recently.
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js…the head of the opposition political party which came in 2nd place in the election, and arrested and jailed its leaders (exactly what Putin has been accused of doing)—all with the support of U.S.— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) February 10, 2022
The usual solid allies in Israel are also not happy with the US support of Ukrainian NAZI’s who the world went to war to stop in the 30’s and 40’s as the US lifts bans on funding neo-NAZI Ukrainian groups.
As the Jerusalem Post said in a recent article:
“Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion, an independent unit that had been integrated into the former Soviet Republic’s national guard and was taking part in operations against Russian- backed rebels.”
“Called a “neo-Nazi paramilitary militia” by Congressmen John Conyers Jr. and Ted Yoho, who co-sponsored the bipartisan amendment, the battalion has been a source of controversy since its inception. However, Congress is reported to have recently repealed its ban on a Ukrainian militia accused of being neo-Nazi, opening the way for American military assistance.“
So does it mean to stand with an army full of NAZI’s being commanded by US and NATO from the shadows, who commit war crimes on video such as the killing of Russian POWS.
Or does it mean to stand with the “National Police” (ex AZOV Battalion members), who publicly announced a “cleansing” of the town of Bucha, in which bodies left on the street for a supposed two weeks were not mentioned when the town was reclaimed but then days later when the Russians had long left the town, seemingly freshly killed bodies appeared in videos on social media with claims of war crimes being laid at Russia’s feet.
All the bodies had white bands on, either tying their hands behind them or on their arms, some with Russian aid packages by their sides, both clear signs of retribution against Russian sympathisers who took aid from the Russian forces, and a false flag attack that only Ukraine gains from where Russian denials are heard by no-one.
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsNew Srebrenica. The Ukrainian city of Bucha was in the hands of 🇷🇺 animals for several weeks. *Local civillians were being executed arbitrarily*, some with hands tied behind their backs, their bodies scattered in the streets of the city.#RussianWarCrimes pic.twitter.com/outzejdidO— Defence of Ukraine (@DefenceU) April 2, 2022
Now that this and other war crimes blamed on Russia were debunked by video, and the killings of POWS were allowed onto social media, the “Democratic Ukraine” we stand with, has made it illegal to film Russian attacks, lest they be debunked by online sleuths. Such as the backward tracking of a missile attack at Kramatorsk train station.
“The relationship of the booster when it came to earth, when assessed to the impact zone of the cluster munitions, provides a reverse azimuth which, even when factoring in a generous margin of error for potential drift, points to territory that was under the exclusive control of the Ukrainian government, which means that there is little doubt that the missile that struck the Kramatorsk train station was fired by a launcher under the operational control of the 19th Missile Brigade, Ukraine’s only Tochka-U-equipped unit….. a forensic evaluation of the missile debris clearly shows that it was launched by the 19th Ukrainian Missile Brigade, based near Dobropolia, some 45 kilometres from Kramatorsk.“
Of course, this is denied by Bellingcat that well known source of US/UK intelligence disinformation, who aided extremists in Syria and specialises in Russian attack pieces.
This is a source that must be overlooked, just like the BBC, UK State TV if ever one existed if we are also to overlook other “biased” sources such as RT.
Does standing with Ukraine mean standing with the journalists who dare speak out about Ukrainian crimes and then just disappear or turn up dead?
Just recently one journalist, Gonzalo Lira, disappeared for a week, only to return without his computer or phone, not allowed to tell anyone what had happened but insinuating that he was being investigated for something, and maybe even tried in a AZOV court for speaking about what he saw on the ground in Ukraine?
So why are we standing with Ukraine?
Well as the US Pentagon is only too happy to admit, it is to give Russia such a bloody nose and to kill as many Russians as possible. Just some of these quotes:
On 24 February, during a White House press conference on the first day of Russia’s invasion, Biden said sanctions are designed not to prevent invasion but to punish Russia after invading “…so the people of Russia know what he has brought on them. That is what this is all about.”, this is despite of course the obvious fact by high inflation numbers and increasing heating costs that Europe is paying a high price to “punish Putin”.
On 27 February, James Heappey, UK Minister for the Armed Forces, wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “His failure must be complete; Ukrainian sovereignty must be restored, and the Russian people empowered to see how little he cares for them. In showing them that, Putin’s days as President will surely be numbered… He’ll lose power and he won’t get to choose his successor.”
Finally, on 1 March, Boris Johnson’s spokesperson said the sanctions on Russia “we are introducing, that large parts of the world are introducing, are to bring down the Putin regime.”
So whilst anybody can sympathise with the displaced and killed Ukrainians who had nothing to do with Putin’s invasion. It is totally stupid to believe that the act of invading Ukraine was totally irrational to anybody but those still sucking the teat of US/UK mainstream media.
The war began after the US led Maiden coup in 2014, and the people of Donbass have been fighting a civil war for their rights ever since.
This article by Retired Swiss Military-Intelligence Officer, Jacques Baud, gives some context to those who think the war only started a month and a bit ago.
Here is an extract:
“The referendums conducted by the two self-proclaimed Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk in May 2014, were not referendums of “independence” (независимость), as some unscrupulous journalists have claimed, but referendums of “self-determination” or “autonomy” (самостоятельность). The qualifier “pro-Russian” suggests that Russia was a party to the conflict, which was not the case, and the term “Russian speakers” would have been more honest. Moreover, these referendums were conducted against the advice of Vladimir Putin.”
“In fact, these Republics were not seeking to separate from Ukraine, but to have a status of autonomy, guaranteeing them the use of the Russian language as an official language — because the first legislative act of the new government resulting from the American-sponsored overthrow of [the democratically-elected] President Yanukovych, was the abolition, on February 23, 2014, of the Kivalov-Kolesnichenko law of 2012 that made Russian an official language in Ukraine. A bit like if German putschists decided that French and Italian would no longer be official languages in Switzerland.”
“This decision caused a storm in the Russian-speaking population. The result was fierce repression against the Russian-speaking regions (Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk) which was carried out beginning in February 2014 and led to a militarization of the situation and some horrific massacres of the Russian population (in Odessa and Mariupol, the most notable)…….” read the rest of the article here.
Now if you want to stand with “Ukraine“, then really you should qualify what you mean. I stand with the Ukrainian people who have been displaced and killed by the war but I also stand with the Ukrainians in the Donbass region who have been discriminated against, massacred, and attacked by the NAZI element in the Ukrainian army, that many like to overlook when it comes to this war.
I don’t stand with Putin, but I stand with the poor people of Ukraine who will be indebted to US and international banks like the IMF for decades to come for all the weapons poured into the country, only to be mostly destroyed on delivery by the Russians.
If you think war debt is nothing to worry about just realise that it was only under Gordon Brown’s rule as Prime Minister of the UK, that we paid back in full the debt we owed to the USA for “help” during World War II.
Of course, the most powerful country on earth is only too happy to help in a war, especially against an enemy of their own, if it means that their own weapons companies get paid, and countries are indebted for decades due to this “help“.
However, I think that we are getting too near the edge of what can be considered acceptable help for Ukraine when their soldiers are stuck in Mariupol, told not to surrender and to fight to their deaths, as no help, weapons, or food comes, and Russian shells rain down on them mercilessly.
I don’t want to be involved in the West’s proxy war with Russia, where they want to fight to the last Ukrainian, not helping those left to rot in the Azovstal factories, as US and UK politicians debate their next attack on Russia.
If it was left to Ukraine, with no western interference, then the peace talks which the Russians started at the same time as their invasion would have concluded by now and there would be some sort of settlement. It is the west who is continuing the slaughter in Ukraine and no one should be in doubt of this fact.
I leave you with this video from the Redacted YouTube channel about the likelihood of this proxy war turning hot as the MIC makes a mint from the selling of weapons to Ukraine.
View the main original article on the main site here.
By Dark Politricks
© 2022 Dark Politricks
Dark Politics 