CDC Article Admits Virus Is Computer Generated

CDC Article Admits COVID19 Is Computer Generated

By Dark Politricks

As YouTube and Google, Facebook, Twitter and the Silicon Valley Nexus crack down on free speech and views that they find “unpalatable” or describe as “hate speech” and block, ban, de-monetize or de-rank if not totally obliterate your site. 

 

New sites are springing up for people wanting to hear news about controversial topics on their own terms. Make your own mind up if you find the contents in the video are “fake news” or just news the authorities don’t want you to hear.

 

One of these new sites if you haven’t been on it yet is “Brand New Tube“, a YouTube like site that won’t de-rank or censor videos on topics that the Silicon Valley / Government nexus don’t want you to hear about and think about 

 

This video is from David Icke about the Coronavirus. I do like one statement made by the presenter who said that the news is scaring people with news that “Manchester Hospital is at COVID19 full capacity“, however that is only the number of beds they have assigned for the virus – 8. So if 8 people have COVID19 and take those 8 beds up the news will then scare you with talk about how the hospital is at “full capacity“.

 

Whatever you think of David Icke, COVID19 and theories surrounding the virus about how it is being used to destroy the economy you might as well listen to this video as it’s the first one I have embedded from www.brandnewtube.com.

 

It looks at how computer models have been used to define what “COVID19” actually is, and how kids who are exempt from wearing masks are now being force fed “fashion masks” with “no medical benefits” to get them wearing masks.

 

Also before listening remember that UK Government Ministers and doctors have admitted that no-one can recover from COVID19.

 

A one Dr Loke said the way Public Health England collects data means “no-one with COVID in England is allowed to recover from their illness”.

 

“A patient who has tested positive, but successfully treated and discharged from hospital, will still be counted as a COVID death even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a bus three months later” 

 

That means I can get COVID19, as defined by ? and then recover, before weeks later drunkenly stumble across the road and get run over by a car means I am not put under the death list for “stupid drunk people”, but another COVID19 death statistic instead. You can see some comparisons between Cancer Deaths, Heart Disease Deaths and COVID19 deaths on my earlier article.

 

These are all serious health conditions that are all being ignored due to Coronavirus. People that need treatment for serious health problems that all have higher death figures than COVID19. How many more people will die from missed operations, and treatments that have been put off due to the COVID19 panic and lock down.

 

That’s not even to mention the Track and Trace apps the Government is pushing on people which is basically being used by Police to track people of interest and see where they go and who they associate with.

 

Brand New Tube are new and sometimes have issues with embedding videos so just click the link underneath if the video is not shown.

Watch the video on Brand New Tube – Embedding Prevented!  

Let me know what you think of the views put out in the video and go and have a look at Brand New Tube and see if there are any topics you have been hidden from viewing on YouTube.com and Facebook.   

Read the original article on the main site www.darkpolitricks.com.

By Dark Politricks

©2020 Dark Politricks

Send Dark Politricks.com examples of police brutality or ways to prevent the machine rolling over us this way!

Send Dark Politricks.com examples of police brutality or ways to prevent the machine rolling over us this way!

By Dark Politricks

This site is a “power to the people”, free speech, anti war on terror, anti Big Brother site that hates stupid laws and regulations and resents our subservience to supra national entities like the EU, the World Bank, the G20 and the move towards globalisation that means jobs are taken away from middle class people like ourselves and given over  to slave workers in China and India who will work for a pittance.

Our country is full of stupid laws that need repealing. There was a gleam of hope when the Liberal Democrats got into power with their much vaunted Freedom Bill but after Tory interference it was watered down to a charter against rouge car clampers.

There was no removal of the unfair extradition treaty to the US or the return to the right of silence without it being brought up in court. No repeal of anti privacy laws that allow countless agencies to enter your house without a warrant and nothing that let us protest when and how we want. Permit to Protest – you must be joking!

Our stupid drug laws fill prisons with people needing treatment not punishment before re-sending them back out to the community to rob and steal to fund their habit again.

Our NHS is a known beacon for anyone around the world wanting free and often expensive health care which we tax payers have to pay for.

And to top it off all the banksters who broke our country in half are carrying on using our pensions as casion chips for their gambling whilst we suffer with closed libraries, schools and other cuts in public services. Why are the people who had nothing to do with the economic collapse being asked to pay for it? Why are future generations being made to pay for the mistakes of the rich current generation?

Our cops are bent as a nine bob note and get away with crimes every day If it wasn’t for the rise of people carrying video cameras around with them and mobile phones many police abuses would not get noticed or recorded for us to see.

Therefore if anyone has any films of policeman acting against their mandate e.g beating people up unnecessarily or breaching their role to “protect and serve” then please send them this way so I can display them

If anyone has ideas on how we can help roll back the surveillance state being built around us then please let me know so I can share those ideas with my readers.

If people have knowledge on using computer systems without being tracked by the authorities then please let me know. Details such as using open Wi-Fi networks and proxies, removing your battery from your phone to stop being GPS/GPRS tracked, preventing iPhone and Google from storing and uploading your data to any policeman with the right tools and using block lists to bypass ISP’s that sniff P2P torrent packets to see what you are downloading. Plus using special software to super encrypt your messages without Microsofts’s back door accessing them all or just using disposable email addresses and proxy server chains to post your messages on Twitter or Facebook anonymously without being tracked. This is all valuable information.

If you have it then please let me know! I have already listed some ways to beat some tracking and logging by the authorities but much more can be done.

 

Also if people know of corrupt, inefficient or wasteful local government departments or councils, or members of such institutions, then please let me know who these people are and what they have done. These are people who live off our tax money.

They are there to serve us NOT themselves. I have personally written letters to MP’s and Government officials and got respones – many have been blatant lies or attempts to placate me so I will vote for them at the next election. Our government is full of crooks and career politicians.

Remember if we don’t stick together and pool our knowledge the machine will continue to roll over us until we are nothing but dust!

So send me any dirt you can find!

 

View the original article “Please send me examples of police brutality or ways to prevent the machine rolling over our liberty!” on darkpolitricks.com.

Time Magazine Pushes Draconian Internet Licensing Plan

Establishment mouthpiece calls for web ID system that would outstrip Communist Chinese style net censorship

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Time Magazine has enthusiastically jumped on the bandwagon to back Microsoft executive Craig Mundie’s call for Internet licensing, as authorities push for a system even more stifling than in Communist China, where only people with government permission would be allowed to express free speech.

As we reported earlier this week, during a recent conference at the Davos Economic Forum, Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer for Microsoft, told fellow globalists at the summit that the Internet needed to be policed by means of introducing licenses similar to drivers licenses – in other words government permission to use the web.

His proposal was almost instantly advocated by Time Magazine, who published an article by Barbara Kiviat – one of Mundie’s fellow attendees at the elitist confab. It’s sadistically ironic that Kiviat’s columns run under the moniker “The Curious Capitalist,” since the ideas expressed in her piece go further than even the free-speech hating Communist Chinese have dared venture in terms of Internet censorship.

“Now, there are, of course, a number of obstacles to making such a scheme be reality,” writes Kiviat. “Even here in the mountains of Switzerland I can hear the worldwide scream go up: “But we’re entitled to anonymity on the Internet!” Really? Are you? Why do you think that?”

Kiviat ludicrously compares the necessity to show identification when entering a bank vault to the apparent need for authorities to know who you are when you set up a website to take credit card payments.

“The truth of the matter is, the Internet is still in its Wild West phase. To a large extent, the law hasn’t yet shown up. Yet as more and more people move to town, that lawlessness is becoming a bigger and bigger problem. As human societies grow over time they develop more rigid standards for themselves in order to handle their increased size. There is no reason to think the Internet shouldn’t follow the same pattern,” she writes.

“The people in charge—as much as anyone can be in charge when it comes to the Internet—are thinking about it,” Kiviat barks in her conclusion, seemingly comfortable with the notion that shadowy individuals and not the Constitution itself are “in charge” of deciding who is allowed free speech.

Despite Kiviat’s mealy-mouthed authoritarianism and feigned reasonableness in advocating such a system, Mundie’s proposal is little different to a similar system already considered by officials in Communist China to force bloggers to register their identities before they could post. At the time the idea was attacked by human rights advocates as an obvious ploy “by which the government could control information” and crack down on dissent.

Indeed, the proposal was deemed too severe and the Chinese government eventually backed down. So a system considered too authoritarian and too much of a threat to freedom in Communist China is seemingly just fine and dandy in the “land of the free,” according to Kiviat and her ilk.

Unfortunately for her, Kiviat was immediately reminded about what makes the Internet such a threat to the ruling elite for whom she is a well-trained apologist – almost every comment below her article disagreed with her.

“No. A thousand times no. This benefits no one but “the people in charge,” wrote one respondent.

“Drivers’ licenses ensure a basic level of driving competency, so that 13-year-olds don’t get drunk and drive into a schoolbus. That kind of stupidity doesn’t happen on the Internet. Enough security theater! Focus on actual security. Truly awful idea, Barbara.”

“I, for one, welcome our new internet overlords. It will be a comforting time when “the law” comes along to protect people from themselves on the net, because gosh darn it, freedom is dangerous,” quips another. “Not to mention, standards only ever come about through coercive government action, and never through private parties responding to their own incentives.”

I think bloggers ought to be fingerprinted, DNA tested for abnormalities and have the information safely stored in a government vault. That way when some authoritarian ruler of pit, decides you have broken his self made tyrannic law he can prosecute you,” jokes another respondent. “For being a journalist you sure are s—-d, anonymity protects the right of free speech especially when the scary internet is most dangerous in a nation that prosecutes freedom of speech and opinion. The biggest thugs and criminals you mentioned are corrupt governments. I bet you love China’s safe internet measures huh? But there are worse than China.”

“The internet is the only thing preventing total tyranny right now, and they are trying everything they can to chill free speech. There is NO grass roots movement anywhere calling for government intervention in the internet. It is not broken. It works too well, that is a problem for tyrants,” points out another.

Shortly after Time Magazine started peddling the proposal, the New York Times soon followed suit with a blog this morning entitled Driver’s Licenses for the Internet? which merely parrots Kiviat’s talking points.

Of course there’s a very good reason for Time Magazine and the New York Times to be pushing for measures that would undoubtedly lead to a chilling effect on free speech which would in turn eviscerate the blogosphere.

Like the rest of the mainstream print dinosaurs, physical sales of Time Magazine have been plummeting, partly as a result of more people getting their news for free on the web from independent sources that don’t feed at the trough of the military-industrial complex. Ad sales for the New York Times sunk by no less than 28 per cent last year with subscriptions and street sales also falling.

“The Internet, where newspapers are generally free, has siphoned off circulation and advertising,” conceded an October 2009 NY Times article, which is precisely why establishment publications like the Old Gray Lady and Time are pushing proposals that would strangle the blogosphere and in turn eliminate their competition – while devastating free speech all in one foul swoop.

Are the days of Internet Freedom coming to an end?

By Dark Politricks

The days of Internet freedom are slowly coming to an end. China started it with their huge national filter to prevent people from accessing sites deemed unacceptable by the state such as sites related to the Chinese dissidents, the outlawed Falun Gong spiritual movement, the Tibetan government-in-exile and those with information on the 1989 Tiananmen massacre.

If this wasn’t bad enough for Chinese Internet users they have just introduced a rule that prevents individuals from registering private domains. From Monday 21st December, people wanting to register a domain in China will have to present a company seal and a business licence to prove they are a legitimate company.

The idea is part of a campaign to rein in pornographic content, but bloggers and Internet activists interpreted it as a broader attempt to enforce Internet censorship more heavily.

“If they really enforce this, we will have to register our sites outside China,” said one blogger.

The move follows a string of measures to crack down on Internet and media content as China shows growing nervousness over user-generated content, which it struggles to control. They have recently blocked Facebook, Twitter and YouTube and 3,000 people have been arrested nationwide for alleged involvement in posting pornographic content online.

You may think that what happens in China doesn’t affect the rest of the world however other Western democracies have looked at China and instead of seeing an example of an overly authoritarian free speech hating state have instead seen a good idea!

We have the recent Australian Internet filter that has been introduced to combat child pornography and adult content and possibly other controversial websites on euthanasia or anorexia. Obviously once setup the list of sites deemed “unacceptable” will just increase exponentially and the list of sites will start to include those critical of the government.

The net nanny proposal was originally going to allow Australians who wanted uncensored access to the web the option of contacting their Internet service provider to be excluded from the service but the government has now declared it will not let Internet users opt out of the national Internet filter.

New Zealand has obviously seen this restriction of  freedom of speech and expression as a good idea as they have also drafted a proposal on similar lines to the Australian filter. Some of the details are listed below:

New Zealand’s censorship laws forbid viewing or owning certain types of material (e.g. depictions of bestiality or sex with children) and this applies to material accessed over the Internet too.

At this moment it [New Zealand] does not [have Internet filtering]. However, the Department of Internal Affairs ran a trial Internet filtering scheme in conjunction with Ihug, Watchdog, Maxnet and TelstraClear in 2007/2008 and is planning to fully implement it in 2009/2010.

[There is now [“Internet Filtering Law”]. [The filtering] it is being done under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993. This gives the responsibility for enforcement to the Department of Internal Affairs.

The scheme is currently voluntary for the ISPs (Internet Service Providers) as there is no law to force them to use it.

The filter is applied at the level of the IP address but it is common for a web server to host multiple websites on a single IP address. All requests to a website on one of the filtered IP addresses will be diverted to the DIA’s server.

ISPs can choose whether to subscribe to it or not. The only way [for a person] to opt-out of the filtering is by switching to an ISP that doesn’t implement it. ISPs that have implemented it so far have not provided a way to opt out of it.

But that’s the other side of the world isn’t it? They haven’t got plans to do anything like that over here have they? Well yes they do. The UK is currently debating legislation slated as the “Digital Economy Bill“ in the House of Lords which would allow the Home Secretary to place “a technical obligation on internet service providers” to block whichever sites it wishes.

Under clause 11 of the proposed legislation “technical obligation” is defined as follows:

A “technical obligation”, in relation to an Internet service provider, is an obligation for the provider to take a technical measure against particular subscribers to its service.

A “technical measure” is a measure that — (a) limits the speed or other capacity of the service provided to a subscriber; (b) prevents a subscriber from using the service to gain access to particular material, or limits such use; (c) suspends the service provided to a subscriber; or (d) limits the service provided to a subscriber in another way.

In other words, the government will have the power to force ISP’s to downgrade and even block your Internet access to certain websites or altogether if it wishes.

The following link is a report on Internet Rights within the European Union which states that

There is a clear consensus therefore that activity on networks should be viewed using the basic legal principles that apply elsewhere. The Internet is not an anarchic ghetto where society’s rules do not apply. Equally, though, the ability of governments and public authorities to restrict the rights of individuals and monitor potentially unlawful behaviour should be no greater on public networks than it is in the outside, off-line world. The requirement that restrictions to fundamental rights and freedoms be properly justified, necessary and proportional in view of other public policy objectives, must also apply in cyberspace.”

Which seems to imply that freedom of speech should exist on the net as it should anywhere else however sites dedicated to illegal activities such as child pornography or bomb making would be deemed suitable for blocking.

As of yet no European wide Internet filter exists however plans are in the pipeline and individual countries including Finland who has created blacklists of sites related to child pornography that have been passed to ISP’s for blocking and also there is the recent case where Denmark ordered the ISP Tele 2 to block access to the Pirate Bay file sharing search engine.

But state censorship proposals don’t stop there, the European Union’s Justice and Security Commissioner Franco Frattini called last September for ISP’s to block access to Web sites hosting information about bomb-making, and U.K. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said in January that she wanted action taken against sites that encouraged terrorism, including social networking sites.

There are 2 main reasons for the internet.

1. Business, marketing and advertising.

Most companies have an online presence where they try to attract new customers and sell their products to other businesses. Then there are sites dedicated to selling products to online shoppers. Sites such as Amazon, ITunes and Play sell DVDs, music, books and other physical items. Smaller sites sell Internet related products such as e-books, anti-spyware or performance tuning software or multi level marketing schemes intended to get you rich beyond your wildest dreams with nothing more than a few clicks of a button and a small up front payment. Sites that don’t actually sell anything such as blogs or personal sites try to make money by showing adverts or using Affiliate schemes e.g Googles Adsense or Buyat. They try to generate large amounts of traffic through various means (spam or legal) in the hope of generating revenue through people clicking on the adverts or buying the products. All These sites are designed to make money for the site owner in one way or another.

2. Leisure and Entertainment

The majority of Internet users fall under this category. They use the web to access alternative news, get info on their favourite band or sports team and to read blogs and watch YouTube videos. They also download or stream movies and watch TV shows on Iplayer and other similar sites. They download and listen to music, use social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook and most of all they watch porn!

People forget how much of the Internet is consumed by sites dedicated to porn and by users who are looking for it. The pornography industry is larger than the revenues of the top technology companies combined e.g Microsoft, Google, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, Apple, Netflix and EarthLink. Also US porn revenue exceeds the combined revenues of ABC, CBS, and NBC.

• Every second – $3,075.64 is being spent on pornography
• Every second – 28,258 Internet users are viewing pornography
• Every second – 372 Internet users are typing adult search terms into search engines
• Every 39 minutes: a new pornographic video is being created in the United States

All these statistics were taken from Internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com

Therefore what government and big business don’t seem to understand is that if they turn the Internet into nothing more than a glorified online shop where the only sites are those dedicated to selling products and advertising then no-one will be on the web in the first place to be induced into buying products from these sites. Without the porn and social networking sites and without the alternative news sites no-one will want to spend time surfing sites related to B2B or MLM spam sites.

It will be like those twitter accounts you see where the person has thousands of followers and is also following thousands of people but they are all either bots or spammers or other people trying to get you to buy their product. All totally pointless.

If you take the good stuff away from the Internet including the freedom to watch what you want in the privacy of your own home and to write what you believe on your own blog whether it criticizes the government or not and you will end up with a lot of people using darknets such as Tor or using Chinese anonymous proxies or even web mesh networks run by people hooking up wireless receivers and relay devices.

If that happens and a proper underground Internet is set up by tech savvy people then the government will install jamming equipment everywhere to prevent the signals and then people will resort to swapping memory sticks and DVDs full of “banned” info in the streets. It will be just like Communist Russia when they used to swap illegal books and other literature in dark corners.

The more the government tries to stop the people from accessing the Internet the more alternative forms of data transfer will spring up. For those of you interested in keeping your privacy on the Internet and getting round any censorship by big brother read the following articles.

1. Create your own web proxy server to bypass logging by your work or school and access banned sites.
2. Internet Censorship and Surfing Anonymously.
3. Bypassing Internet Censorship.
4. Searching for content without being logged by your employer or big brother.
5. The death of the Internet bills in the UK and Australia

Internet Censorship and Surfing Anonymously

By Dark Politricks

From a users perspective the Internet contains a myriad of security and privacy issues which if the user is not aware of could cause potential problems on all manner of levels. For the privacy conscious person who wants to be able to surf the net without worrying about someone looking at the content they have visited in real time or at a future date then there are a number of issues. For example with a few lines of script client side or server side you can find out details that can be used to identify your computer e.g

Powered by IP Address Locator

As with most web content if you wanted to be 100% anonymous on the web it will be pretty hard to do but there are various forms of tracking that you should be aware of so that you can limit the risks to you whilst surfing.

Javascript urchins

These are little bits of script that are added to the source code of the HTML page you are visiting. They use JavaScript to record identifying features about the user and their browser such as the user-agent, system details and location by calling a script on another server that then logs these details to a central database. A good example is Google Analytics.

How to bypass

Turning off Javascript will prevent this logging from occurring.

Webbugs

Similar to urchins these are little images, usually so small they cannot be seen, that point back to a web server and run some code whenever the image is loaded by a client. They tend to be used by email marketing tools and are embedded within HTML emails so that they can record who has actually opened the email and track the email if its forwarded it on.

How to bypass

Many email clients if they don’t do it automatically have the option to display emails as plain text which would prevent these webbugs from working.

Server Side logging by the page

Most pages on the web nowadays are more than pure HTML/CSS and contain code that runs server side e.g .asp, .php, .jsp, .aspx etc.

When the page is requested the web server parses the page and runs any code before returning the generated HTML to the client. This code has access to a lot of information about the client requesting the page such as IP address which can be used for GEO tagging, User-agent details, accepted file types and other information contained within the headers. They could choose to log this information to a database or file if they wanted to even if the IIS or Apache web server had its own logging disabled.

How to bypass

Please read the guide under the following section about web server logging as it applies to both.

Logging by the Web Server

Every time you make an HTTP request e.g access a web page, a record is made on the web server that hosts that page to a log file. Each separate file contained within that web page is logged so every image, css file and script is logged along with your IP address, the method e.g POST or GET, the URL, bytes sent and received and much much more.

Although its possible to turn off this logging most companies running web servers require these logs for traffic analysis e.g with a tool such as Webtrends as it helps analyse traffic from all agents including robots who do not have JavaScript support. Also many countries now require ISP’s to keep log files for up to a year or more in case the data is required at a later date.

How to bypass

As you must assume that the web servers you are visiting sites on have logging enabled then the only way to not get tracked is to go through proxy servers. A proxy is an intermediate server that sits between you and the web server you want to access. If someone was tracking you they would only see your request to the proxy server and not the actual content that the proxy server requests on your behalf.

There are various forms of proxy some that are anonymous and others that pass your IP address along in the HTTP_FORWARDED_FOR and HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR headers.

There is a form of proxy known as an “anonymizer” as it hides all the users identifying information such as headers that hold the IP and user-agent.

Anonymizers are not entirely secure. If an anonymizer keeps logs of incoming and outgoing connections and the anonymizer is physically located in a country where it is subjected to warrant searches then there is a potential risk that government officials can reverse engineer and identify all users who used the anonymizer and how they used it.

Most anonymizers state they do not keep logs but there is currently no way to confirm that. However, if the user used another anonymizer to connect to the exposed anonymizer, that user is still anonymous. This is sometimes called daisy-chaining.

Cookies

Cookies are small text files that are stored on the clients computer and contain very small pieces of text. They are mainly used by websites to store flags that enable the site to know whether you have previously been to their site or not. Advertisers use them to track the type of sites you visit so that they can deliver targeted advertising.

Another type of cookie is a session variable which is used by many sites to store a unique ID that refers to a visit on the site. The ID is generated by the web server and the session cookie only stores this ID so that on each request to the server the system knows that the visitors requests belong to one visit.

How to bypass

If you are concerned about tracker cookies then you easily disable site related cookies in your browser but if you disable all cookies then Session variables won’t work and you will most likely find yourself getting logged out of member only areas of websites or not being able to login in the first place.

Flash, ActiveX, Java Applets

3rd party components such as Flash, ActiveX controls and Java applets come with their own security concerns. There have been numerous security vulnerabilities reported with these types of component as due to their complexity and power they have more access to the clients computer than a normal web page. They should be seen as mini applications rather than just a fancy banner, game or helpful utility to enable you to upload files to Facebook more quickly.

You shouldn’t install these types of application unless you are totally sure they are safe as they could have a lot more control over your computer than you realise. There have even been hacks that have enabled remote users to video and record a user through their webcam without them knowing.

How to bypass

You can use Firefox extensions such as FlashBlock or AdBlocker to disable flash on specific pages. If you decided to choose privacy over anything else then you will end up having a pretty boring web experience as more and more sites use Javascript and Flash to deliver interactive content.

However if you are really security conscious you should use a text browser such as Lynx which won’t load images, flash, JavaScript or any other form of plug-in. It will show you the textual content of the pages you visit and will ask if you want cookies to be stored for each request. Due to only loading text and links you will have fast load times so there is a benefit to having a reduced web interface.

You should also regularly check your PC for viruses and spyware. One of the first things modern Trojans do nowadays is download good anti-virus software so that they don’t get overwritten by another spyware app!

They also try to disguise themselves as virus checkers to avoid detection. Even the best off the shelf virus checkers don’t catch all forms of spyware especially those that have to regularly download virus definition patterns as it means new viruses don’t get caught until they have been identified, a pattern created and downloaded by the client.

Virus payloads can also be modified randomly to avoid pattern detection so tools that don’t use pattern matching such as hijackthis.exe which runs an analysis of all currently running processes looking for odd behaviour are good tools to use. This tool will generate a report which can then be analysed by members of the special Hijackthis.exe message board for signs of infection. One of the best removers of Trojans I have found is a tool called SDFix.exe which managed to detect and remove a Trojan that four other tools including an off the shelf app didn’t detect. Tools to use to aid privacy on the web Firefox Add-Ons

• Web Developer toolbar. Disable Javascript, cookies, view cookie and header info, modify the DOM, view generated source code, show password fields.
• Flashblock disables flash movies until you enable them. Allows creation of a white-list of allowed sites.
• FoxyProxy manage your proxies with an easy to use tool.
• Tamperdata acts like a proxy and allows you to modify HTTP requests as they are made from your client.

Google Searching

• Scroogle Search a way to search Google through an SSL, with no logging, no adverts and no cookies.

Google Chrome

• Use Incognito browsing to prevent browser and search history and cookies from being stored.

All browsers

• De-activate Javascript, VBScript (IE only)
• De-activate domain and path cookies.
• If you share a PC Clear your cache, autocomplete, and history regularly.

If you need more details about the various forms of Internet Censorship and how to bypass it then check out the following article that contains a lot of details about the various methods used and how to bypass them.

How to bypass Internet Censorship If you are looking for an up to date list of available proxy servers then you can check out the following links:

http://www.digitalcybersoft.com/ProxyList/fresh-proxy-list.shtml

http://www.workingproxies.org/

The following page has an index where you can find more proxy lists http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Proxying_and_Filtering/Hosted_Proxy_Services/Free/Proxy_Lists/

If you want to quickly access some web based proxies you can pick from the following list or you can read my guide on creating your own web proxy which comes with an example and some code you can use to get running.