I like Brother Nathanael, as a non Zionist, ex Jew converted to Christianity, he calls Israel and Mossad out for all the things that they are doing to stir the wars up around the world.
Therefore when he criticizes Israel and their foreign policy you should listen to him. He isn’t being forced to tell the “official line” or lies about what is going on. He tells it as it is, so believe him or not, you should still listen to him.
Brother Nathanael discusses why Turkey, the supporter of DAESH, shot down the Russian jet
Brother Nathanael discusses the real reasons why Turkey shot down the Russian jet that was bombing the snake of oil trucks sliding its way to Turkey for the Turks to buy, and therefore funding Daesh and other jihadists that they are supposed to be fighting.
Brother Nathanael discusses the Paris terrorist attacks and Mossad’s involvement in them
I have been saying for ages now on this site and social media how odd it is that DAESH or ISIL/ISIS has not been concerned with Israel but more with Christians and other Muslims.
Unlike other terrorist groups who blame their hatred on the west for our support of the Zionist and increasingly racist state of Israel, not much has come out of the mouths of DAESH.
This is the most well funded, best armed and manned terrorist army ever known to man and they are right on Israel’s border in Syria.
Yet Israel seems more concerned with kids throwing stones at Israeli tanks before killing them in Gaza and the West Bank than this well armed terrorist monster. Why?
Well watch this video by Brother Nathaniel and you might get some clues to Mossad’s involvement in the creation and existence of DAESH.
What is unsurprising to me but may shock others is that Mossad has apparently infiltrated DAESH at the highest places, even pretending to be Inmans and then ordering terrorist attacks that benefit the Jewish state.
If this is true then this surely another sign that they were probably doing the same with al-Qaeda and I have reported on Mossad creating fake al-Qaeda cells many times before. This also lends even more credence to the Mossad 9.11 false flag attack theory.
This is based around the fact that more Jews than Muslims (probably all known Mossad agents in the country), were arrested in the days after 9.11. They were kept for a long time and then deported. Why? What questions were they asked and why were they arrested in the first place? Who got them released and why were they held so long? All questions I would love to know the answers to.
A truck driven by a Mossad linked company with the same type of bolt cutters that the terrorists apparently used on the hijacked planes was found in New York by Police who thought they were about to carry out another terrorist attack and the Mossad agents who were arrested filming the attacks across the river and admitted on Israeli TV that they were sent to “document the event”.
Watch it here if you have not seen it before.
Oh and that doesn’t even mention half of the other links including the fact that Mossad were apparently following these 9.11 hijackers around the US for months before hand, even living doors away from some of them.
So to hear that Mossad is once again fighting “By Way of Deception”, is no surprise, and it perfectly explains why ISIS is not even bothered about Israel.
Remember the ex Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky (another self hating Jew – there is quite a lot of them it seems) claimed that Israel’s plan was to get the US and their western allies to do all their dirty work for them.
They successfully tricked the Americans into bombing Libya in the 80’s, then planned to get the US to get rid of Saddam Hussein (then a US ally against Iran), and finally President Assad in Syria.
It seems all their plans have almost come to fruition until the appearance of Russia helping to defend the Assad regime.
These are some very good videos which sceptics and believers of the official conspiracy story on 9/11 and what brought down the Twin Towers should watch.
Why? Well the videos contain numerous clips of TV footage from the day of the attacks which are hard to find nowadays.
This TV footage from mainstream channels shows numerous witnesses and TV commentators speaking of how they heard bombs and explosives go off. What is very illuminating is how on the day of the event even the mainstream media were willing to ask questions about explosives, controlled demolitions and drones / military planes being flown into the buildings. It’s such a shame that they are all now towing the party line and keeping quiet about what they know happened that day.
From Fireman to Policeman, reporters and office workers there are numerous witnesses who on the day claim to have been in all parts of the WTC when they either saw, heard or were injured by explosions that happened BEFORE the Towers fell.
This includes the smashed up lobby which is seen on camera in which people died which the official story explains by claiming fire from the planes shot down the elevator from the impact site.
This is despite the fact that the elevators were hermetically sealed which would have prevented this from occurring. Also whilst people are seen on camera in the holes near the plane impact zones perfectly unharmed people were being killed, burned and thrown all over the place hundreds of floors away at the bottom of the towers.
There is also enough live video footage to rubbish claims that no loud bangs, explosions or cutter charge like sounds were heard on the day. Numerous clips will show you how loud the explosions were and how similar they were to demolition explosives as well as dozens of witnesses who talk about leaving the scene as “bombs are still in the building”.
The videos also explain how easy it would be for a small team of people to plant enough explosives near the cores of the Twin Towers without:
Being spotted by witnesses.
Taking a long time as skeptics claim.
And using only a dozen or so small inconspicuous boxes containing high-grade military explosives.
By planting these high explosives on every second floor and using programmed timers it would be easy to demolish the central core of the WTC and stage what looked like a pancake collapse.
The Maths is pretty simple and the power outs in the days leading up to 9/11 would have provided these conspirators with enough time and cover to carry out their job without being spotted.
Not only were the bomb sniffing dogs pulled out of the towers before the attacks but CIA9.11 whistleblowerSusan Lindaur, who was one of the first people arrested under the PATRIOT Attack for trying to tell her story, explains how in the run up to the attacks vans and men carrying tools and equipment would visit the towers every night for days in a row between 3-5 am in the morning when no other staff were present.
The blackouts gave the cover that engineers needed to do work as well as enabling CCTV to be off at the time needed to plant the explosives. A small team could plant enough bombs to demolish both towers within 24 hours.
How they could have easily rigged the WTC Towers for demolition
The videos also show some clips I personally haven’t seen until now including a shot of WTC-7 before it fell and what looks like cutter charges going off all across the building.
You can actually see small flashes of light dot from window to window from the right to left of the building and this would have been required for WTC-7 to fall into its own footprint the way it did.
No sporadic fires could have caused such an evenly and well-timed collapse including the 2+ seconds of freefall. Even the company NIST asked to carry out experiments to try and prove how the buildings fell could not replicate a collapse scenario which means NIST had to rely on computer models and unrealistic parameters to explain how a single point of failure caused what looks like a demolition sequence in WTC-7.
Just like the video of the collapse of WTC-7 which shows the Penthouse of the building dipping before the rest of the structure the same goes for the Twin Towers. You can see the highest points of the towers, the aerials and other equipment on top of the tower’s core dip before the rest of the building starts to collapse. This all indicates that the central columns had been removed first.
For people who haven’t seen the structure of WTC and think a plane and office fires could have demolished it’s huge central core think again.
The way the building was built meant that even if the trusses and other supporting columns and beams were weakened by fire or a plane the central core would remain intact. The sides of the building may have toppled or slowly fallen off bit by bit but there is no way a fire could have caused the huge central core to be crushed and pulverized into dust as it was.
The explosive nature of the collapse was so intense that steel and other materials were melded together and fires burnt underground for ages during the clean up process.
Pictures of the WTC Twin Towers Design and Central Core
The videos also show clips of other buildings that were hit by debris from WTC, including buildings where huge steel girders were embedded into their walls after being shot out sideways from the collapse.
How a fire could have caused enough pressure to do this I don’t know but these other buildings didn’t catch fire and then have a free fall like collapse as WTC-7 did. Therefore it is very odd how WTC-7 acted in the way it did when many other buildings were hit by the falling debris from WTC.
What explosives were used to destroy the Twin Towers
The numerous interviews with witnesses and bystanders from the day also talk about the military looking planes that hit the buildings.
There are multiple witnesses who saw the planes and detail how they were grey or very dark, and didn’t look anything like the red and blue American Airlines aircraft that supposedly hit the Twin Towers.
Remember that even back in the 60’s certain people in the Military and US government (Operation Northwoods) thought it was a good idea to stage a false flag attack and blame it on Cuba by automatically flying planes, sending out fake distress calls saying they had been hijacked by Cubans and then crash the planes. All this so that the US public would believe Cuba was at fault therefore legitimizing a war of aggression against the island. If the US could plan a false flag attack like that back in the 60’s then imagine what automated chaos they could instigate with modern technology.
Military Planes Used To Hit The Twin Towers
In the following video CIAwhistle-blower, Susan Lindaur, gives a speech where she explains the war with Iraq wasn’t necessary and that before 9.11 Iraq was actually bending over backwards to help the USA. They even offered to provide the US Government with everything they wanted which negated any need for an armed conflict. She claims her back channel mission between the US and Iraq had provided a lucrative and unexpected bounty of gifts which has been kept secret from the US population.
This included:
Allowing the weapons inspectors into the country.
An FBI presence in the country to hunt down terrorists.
Llucrative oil and commercial contracts.
Even Saddam Hussein offering to stand down and hold free elections.
She also talks about her reasons for believing that both hijacked planes AND explosives were used to bring down the Twin Towers, the planes being a cover story for the demolition job. It is well worth listening to the story of a 9.11 whistleblower who tried to tell her story to the US government and the people but was instead jailed for a year under the nefariously named PATRIOT ACT.
Although much of the physical evidence has been destroyed a lot hasn’t and many witnesses and conspirators are still walking around freely.
Obama never brought the change the USA required after the criminal Bush administration therefore only a real concerted push by the people can bring around REAL change.
It’s either that or you continue to stick your heads in the sand.
Know your place. Do NOT ask questions. Keep quiet and suffer in silence as the war on terror is used to justify a massive crack down on civil liberties and the building of a new high-tech police state. Be monitored 24/7 and treated like criminals at airports. Be sheep on a slow walk to the slaughter house.
Or you can stand up for what you know is wrong. Fight the lies we are constantly being fed by our Government and their bought off media whores. Ask questions and don’t accept the official line. Do something worthwhile with your life whilst you still can.
I looked at some remaining questions in an article on the Pentagon attack the other day and after watching the final cut of Loose Change I have complied a fuller list.
These questions include, but are not limited to:
We know that the CIA basically created “the database” which is the translation of al-Qaeda. As ex Foreign Secretary Robin Cook attested to this database was a list of CIA assets used in by the USA during their covert fight with the USSR in Afghanistan. Were the CIA still using al-Qaeda assets at the time of 9.11?
We also know that Mossad has controlled al-Qaeda rings before (even setting up fake rings) – was this a controlled ring or a co-opted ring “allowed” to commit the attack. Both FOX News and German newspapers reported on the Israeli spy rings that were following some of the hijackers about the USA. Did they tell anyone?
What about the Mossad agents who claimed to have been sent to “document the event”? What event and how did they know to set up camera’s across the river to film the attack?
The CIA apparently knew about Atta and the other hijackers and that they posed a threat to the country through their secret Able Danger operation. Why was this important pre-attack evidence not used to stop it OR was it just ignored?
Why won’t any mainstream US media station interview the most gagged woman in history, Sibel Edmonds, an FBI translator who has promised to blow the lid of 9.11 with facts and revelations which she believes would lead to high level indictments.
Why did the Bush administration refuse to hold an enquiry until the families of the 9.11 victims demanded one and then why did they only give the commission minimal funds, far less than the non-consequential event that was the Monica Lewinsky scandal?
Why did the US secret service not interview the bin-Laden family before being spirited out of the USA straight after 9.11, especially when their family member was the prime culprit?
Why was the 9.11 commission used to push for a war with Iraq?
Why were the victims and families of the worst terrorist attack in recent years afforded minimal funds to investigate, poorly, the biggest attack on the USA since Pearl Harbour.
Were any of the hijackers involved in drug smuggling out of the infamous Venice airport and who knew about this? The airport is a known smuggling route that has apparently been given the “green light” by the CIA and has some very dodgy links with mobsters, cocaine cartels, intelligence agencies and terrorists all of which Daniel Hopsicker has documented in his videos and on his site Madcow Morning News.
Many of the victims families, survivors and first responders want a new enquiry. In fact over 80,000 people from New York signed a petition demanding a new enquiry which the city prevented from occurring. Why did New York block the people from having their own inquiry into the events of that day?
Those are just a fraction of the many questions that can be asked but the final cut of Loose Change is well worth watching even if you have seen the first two.
Remember that whether you believe the official conspiracy theory or an alternative theory there still remains questions and when even the commissioners from the single, poorly funded 9.11 commission are making statements such as:
“I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.. This is not spin. This is not true.” – John Farmer
“One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”. – Max Cleland
“We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting” – Timothy Roemer
Lets have an independent 9.11 commission with subpoena powers and lets put to bed all remaining questions about that day once and for all.
The following link is to a 2 hour radio show from James Whale on Talk Sport ( a UK talk radio station ).
It is a detailed show which includes a debate between David Ray Griffin and George Monbiot. George is a believer of the official conspiracy theory however he himself admits there was probably a conspiracy to cover up the Bush administrations incompetence after the event.
The talk then moves on to a debate with the co-director of the final cut, Tim Sparke as well as Jason Bermas. It is well worth the listen if you have the time.
If you know my thoughts on 9.11 then you know I have gone back and forth on the events many times.
Initially when the 9.11 attacks happened, like many people I started off believing the official conspiracy theory.
Then after a lot of reading up on the subject, discovering the questions over WTC-7, the Israeli spy rings following the terrorists around the USA, the repeated warnings about the attacks, The ABLE Danger Program and evidence of the stand down order provided by Norman Mineta I went the other way.
Recently I have been reading a lot more about building 7 and have been swaying back again due to the multiple computer program simulations they used to “prove” the collapse (by fire). However I am still not convinced and it still leaves a massive co-incidence theory instead of a conspiracy theory stuck right in my throat. One I am still not prepared to fully give up.
What I have always wanted is a proper, subpoena powered, proper investigation into the events of the day. Also proper logical answers to all the questions that remain, or haven’t been asked. Until that happens I am going to be raising questions and asking for answers.
When people put reputations on the line to raise questions then they should be listened to and numerous ex Government officials, intelligence officers, military men, first responders and families of the victims all have raised these questions.
Remember, this is not to say that these questions don’t have perfectly reasonable and logical answers to them, it’s just that many people including myself haven’t heard the answers, or that the provided answers don’t fit together to explain the events.
So until the point a new investigation is held I will always have a lingering doubt about the events of 9/11. This is especially due to the fact that you only have to look at the state of America now to see how the war on terror has been used to attack all our liberties and freedoms.
Whether the attack was a false flag attack or not, it certainly was taken advantage of, and used to implement what looks like a high tech police state in the once free America.
The PATRIOT ACT, NDAA, Prism, TRAPWIRE, Assassination Squads, Drones, Constant War, should I go on….
Some Questions
Just some of the “coincidences” and unanswered questions I still have are below – and God knows this is only a small subset of them!
3 Steel framed buildings, the first to collapse from fire alone, all owned by the same person collapse in the same day, just after being taken over by a new owner and having massive insurance for terrorism put on them.
This is along with the hijackers all successfully taking over 4 planes with only rudimentary weapons. Not one of their planes being challenged in the sky, even after the first attack on New York was known about.
The Israeli spy rings that were following some of the hijackers about the USA. Did they tell anyone? We know Mossad has controlled al-Qaeda rings before (even setting up fake rings) – was this a controlled ring or a co-opted ring “allowed” to commit the attack. Both FOX News and German newspapers reported on this.
Why did so many Israeli agents get arrested in the aftermath of the attacks, held for months, then let go?
What did the Israeli’s caught filming the attacks across the river know about the attacks and why did they say they were sent to “document the event”? What foreknowledge did they have and why were they so happy to see the WTC burning?
Even if the attack was “allowed to happen”this is still a state crime as it means someone in the US Government had to order a stand down to NORAD.
We know the CIA / Mossad have had close links to al-Qaeda and bin-Laden, even the CIA visited him in hospital soon before the attacks. What was his real role apart from patsy in the attacks?
We also know the US consulate in Yemen was providing passports for jihadists to come to the US to be trained and then sent off to fight elsewhere. Why were the CIA engaged in such behaviour and what were the links to the Miami airports that were CIA “green zones”, areas that CIA planes were allowed to bring in drugs and arms. The links between the US intelligence community and our supposed enemy al-Qaeda are always murky and unclear. Who knows whether certain factions in the Government or the intelligence community knew the attacks were about to happen.
We know false flag attacks are a reality. We also know the PNAC document was written by the same people who were in government at the time. People who co-incidentally were involved in a massive financial scam involving the ex-USSR (see video below).
What about the ABLE Danger program that had identified the 9.11 hijackers months before the attack occurred and the many other warnings given by foreign intelligence as well as domestic agencies about the attacks. What about the warnings given to key politicians not to fly that day?
What about the ISI chief who wired money to the lead hijacker who was coincidentally meeting with top US military figures on the day of the attacks.
What about the planes which looked unlike commercial airliners, who were expertly piloted into the WTC by non-expert pilots. Were these planes remote controlled?
What about the white planes who were seen in the air over the White House when all planes were supposed to be grounded, who was flying these planes?
The Israeli Connection
We know that dozens if not hundreds of people arrested after the 9.11 attacks were from Israeli origin. After many weeks in detention they were all let go without charge.
Why were they held in the first place?
Who forced their release?
As for the Israeli’s caught across the river filming the attacks, caught hi-fiving each other, before being arrested. Why were they so happy to see the carnage unfold?
This is a clip from an interview they did on Israeli TV.
How did these Israeli’s, with links to Mossad, know to “document the event”? If they didn’t have pre-knowledge of the attacks then what event were they sent to document?
The 9.11 Commission
The 9.11 commission was a farce. Not only did they leave out the reasons that the terrorists themselves claimed that they attacked the USA, which is the USA’s foreign policy and their support for Israel, but they ignored evidence and questions such as the one posed above about the Israeli connection.
They also ignored key evidence which suggested a stand down order by Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta and instead used the commission to push for war with Iraq.
Even 6 of the 10 commissioners have made statements that seem to suggest they were not happy with the outcome. Some even going as far as to suggest the White House lied, the CIA covered up evidence and even blocked access to key witnesses.
Some of these statements included:
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerreysaid that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”
9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”
Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.
9/11 Commissioner John Lehman said that “We purposely put together a staff that had – in a way – conflicts of interest”.
The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry, said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.. This is not spin. This is not true.”
When no-one was even sacked or demoted due to the failings of intelligence which were supposedly the cause of the attacks and instead promoted then you must ask whether these people were doing their jobs correctly or not.
If doing your job badly, leading to the worst terrorist attack on mainland USA, leads to your promotion, then logically you have to consider that their job was to allow the event to occur.
Steven Abbot, coordinator of Dick Cheney’s task force on problems of national preparedness.
Michael Maltbie, the supervisor handling the case at the FBI’s Radical Fundamentalist Unit.
Pasquale D’Amuro, in charge of counter-terrorism in New York.
So yes I still have massive amounts of reservation before I can conclude that the official story is correct and until a proper investigation is held we will never know.
Project Hammer
This video is one I watched the other day and it gives some new context to the events of 9.11 as it infers that the attacks were co-ordinated to cover up a massive financial fraud involving the fire-sale of post USSR Russia in the 90’s.
Whether this is true or not only detailed investigation would prove but it is does a worthwhile job putting the pieces together and includes detailed links to names, aircraft bases and companies all possibly involved in the attacks.
When it comes to the attack on the Pentagon I also still have doubts about that attack even though at first I thought it was one of the least suspicous parts of the story.
Even though I know many witnesses claim to have seen the plane hit the re-inforced walls of the Pentagon there are many questions that remain unanswered. This is mainly due to there not being any photographic or video evidence of a plane actually hitting the Pentagon and the refusal of the Government to release all the CCTV and other camera footage that would have caught the planes impact and lay these questions to rest.
Whilst I used to be on the side of those who believed the Pentagon “missile” attack was a diversion from the real conspiracy in New York I still want to know what exactly happened and how.
How did a plane that big, flying so low and fast by an inexperienced pilot, making expertly executed turns at speeds far above the planes supposed fastest speed manage to punch through 3 rings of the most secure building in the world – without being caught on a single camera?
I used to believe that witness statements should be given their due. If witnesses claimed to hear bombs go off in the WTC, or hear a countdown at WTC-7, or see cutter charges go off then they shouldn’t be dismissed at the Pentagon for claiming to see Flight 77 hit the building. It was just unfair to admit some witness testimony because it backed your argument then dismiss others that went against it.
However we all know that after big events, especially traumatic ones, witness statements often don’t match and even conflict with each other.
Therefore a plane could have easily flown low across the Pentagon giving the impression that it was about to hit it before a missile or bomb went off. The plane then could have rose up through the explosions and fire. It probably wouldn’t be seen or even if it was it would soon be forgotten about due to everyone concentrating on the flames and smoke rising from the Pentagon.
The only CCTV camera evidence from one of the most photographed and surveyed areas in the world has only revealed 5 frames of nothing but a flash from one camera. It doesn’t prove that Flight 77 hit the building at all.
If the Government wanted to kill conspiracytheories around the Pentagon once and for all they would release all confiscated camera and CCTV footage that was collected by investigators in the aftermath of the attack.
By not doing so they only lend credibility to conspiracytheories. This then assumes that they either want these theories to go on or don’t care about them as they offer some form of cover.
Evidence That A Plane Didn’t Hit The Pentagon
Not only do many pilots claim that the manoeuvre that was carried out by Flight 77 was impossible. Both being too fast for the type of plane to accomplish without falling apart but also too hard for even seasoned pilots to manage, let alone an amateur, but evidence exists that suggests the plane did in fact fly over the building.
Analysis of the flight data recorder from Flight 77 which supposedly hit the Pentagon shows a so far unexplained discrepancy between the altitude of the plane and what supposedly happened. Basically it means that the lamp posts which the plane supposedly hit would have had to have been 440 feet high for the plane to have brought them down – an impossibility!
It also suggests that the plane flew over the Pentagon NOT into it.
This is data which has been released by the National Transportation Safety Board and it means that the planes altitude is in direct conflict with the only CCTV footage that has been released of the impact.
Either the data from the black box is wrong somehow (e.g it was edited before being released) or the plane didn’t actually hit the lamp posts and then crash into the Pentagon. Which data-set is correct? I don’t know but it is a question that needs answering.
Then there is the size of the impact hole which was very small. To the sides of the hole there were no signs of wing marks or the huge engines that should have hit it. Even if the wings had folded back and crumpled into the body the huge engines should have been visible on the unscratched grass of the Pentagon.
The dimensions of the hole do not seem to fit those of a Boeing 757 and there is no sign of plane parts either in the hole, as attested to by witnesses at the scene, or on the grass outside which is evident from the first film footage shot of the aftermath. This footage was not requested by the 9.11 commission as the Jesse Ventura video at the bottom attests.
What Happens When A Plane Hits Concrete?
Here is a video which shows a test to prove whether a Japanese nuclear power station could withstand an airplane hitting it.
In the test they used a rocket-propelled, 27-ton F-4 Phantom jet, attached to a sled, aimed to hit a 3.7 meter thick slab of concrete at a speed of about 475 miles per hour which is the same speed that Flight 77 reportedly hit the Pentagon.
Notice how the plane does NOT go through the wall but disintegrates into chunks on the outside of the wall.
This is unlike the Pentagon attack where we are asked to believe that not only were the huge engines of a Boeing 757 not found imprinted on the wall of the Pentagon, they were seemingly not found at all.
In fact only small parts of a plane (or missile) were found and even Boeing employees when asked claimed that these parts did not belong to the suggested plane.
Also there is the question of how a plane made out of very lightweight materials could have a nose so strong that it punched through three rings of concrete as it supposedly did at the Pentagon.
Whereas the plane in the video above crumples up on impact with the concrete wall we are asked to believe that Flight 77 managed to punch it’s way through 3 rings of concrete at the Pentagon. Something a missile would do very well but a Boeing 757 isn’t capable of due to the weakness of the planes nose.
To go with this we are expected to believe that no passenger bodies were found at the scene. Instead only bodies of people from the Pentagon were recovered. It was only later at another location that the passengers were supposedly identified. These could have easily been faked.
We also have witnesses from within the building who claim not to have seen any signs of a plane at all, even being threatened (or “corrected”) in their assertion that a bomb had gone off (as the later video shows).
At other plane crash sites, bodies are found still in their plane chairs, however none were at the Pentagon. Multiple witnesses and journalists made statements that no evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon could be seen on the grass or even within the hole that many witnesses walked through on their way to safety.
Then there is the question of how a plane of that size reportedly flew 400 mph at only 30ft above the ground to hit the first floor of the building without hitting the ground first.
If experienced pilots claim this feat would have been impossible for them to accomplish, then how could an inexperienced pilot such as Hani Hanjour, someone who had been denied the usage of a small Cessna 172 because he was such a bad pilot, make such a manoeuvre.
Others believe that the the immense down-force from the plane would have prevented it from flying so close to the ground at such speeds and that it would have crashed into the ground leaving marks on the untouched Pentagon lawn way before the walls that it reportedly hit.
I have personal contact with someone who worked with aircraft all their professional life, working with Rolls Royce aircraft engines.
When asked how a plane that size could fly so fast and so low to the ground without toppling over due to the huge down-force he replied – “with difficulty and a great deal of skill”. Something which we know the pilot reportedly had none of.
Whether you think it’s a distraction or not lots of questions remain about the Pentagon. In fact lots of questions remain around 9.11 as a whole. With the recent Prism scandal we should always remember that it was the events of 9.11 that has led to our current high tech surveillance state.
This is Jesse Ventura’s look into the Pentagon attacks.
View the original article “The Pentagon Attack – 9.11” at the main site www.darkpolitricks.com
TerrorStorm – Full 2nd edition documentary on False Flag Attacks
By Dark Politricks
This is the 2nd edition of the popular Alex Jones documentary TerrorStorm that looks in detail at the proven history of false flag events and state sponsored terrorism including modern false flag attacks such as the 7/7 London bombings and 9/11.
For anyone who doesn’t believe these two recent terror events were false flag attacks carried out by government intelligence agencies. Either deliberately “or allowed to happen” to further the case for our current decade of war, the loss of liberties at home, an increase in state surveillance and the rise of a modern high-tech police state, you just need to read up on the following proven events.
The Lavon Affair – an Israeli false flag attack in the 50’s that aimed to attack US and British targets in Egypt so that they could be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood and keep British troops in control of the Suez canal. This is a proven false flag operation that led to the resignation of Israeli defence minister Pinhas Lavon and is admitted as such by Israel.
The Gulf of Tonkin attack – the “non event” that was used as a pretext by the US government under President Lyndon B. Johnson to start the Vietnam war. This attack has now been admitted to have never occurred however it was reported as a North Vietnamese attack on US ships and used to justify the war.
Operation AJAX – the reason the Iranians still call us the “Great Satan“. The democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh was other thrown by a combination of US and British intelligence operations that were used to keep control of the oil fields that had been nationalised by Mosaddegh.
After the coup the western powers installed a puppet Shah which ruled over the country ruthlessly until the Islamic revolution in 1979.
We also have the Iraq war and the numerous propaganda stunts (both real and planned) that drove us into this unpopular and unnecessary war.
Not only was the 9.11 commission used to justify the war with witnesses such as Laurie Mylroie claiming Saddam Hussien was behind every major terrorist attack in recent years but we had the “dodgy dossier” that was full of exaggerated claims that the Iraqi army could attack British forces with Weapons of Mass Destruction within 45 minutes and the sad spectacle of the once respected US Secretary of State Colin Powell lying to the UN about the certainty of the existence of Iraqi WMD.
So not only have false flag attacks been used many times in the past they have been discussed very recently even if you don’t believe 9.11 or 7/7 were such events.
Whatever you think of Alex Jones the documentary is well worth watching and I have no reason to believe someone could “act” 24/7 as a government stooge by letting people have “controlled government information” as many claim Alex and other alternative news personalities do. Sometimes you have to realise that if you go too far down the rabbit hole everyone starts looking like a rabbit!
To those that claim he blatantly ignores Israel and the Jewish angle during his conspiracy theorising I would say his wife maybe Jewish but then so what? During the film he talks about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty during the 1967 war and how Israel deliberately attacked and murdered US Navy troops during a false flag attack designed to draw the USA into the conflict.
As witnesses from the ship were ordered on pain of death or imprisonment to stay silent, and twice aircraft sent to help the USS Liberty were called back by Lyndon Johnson who apparently claimed “I want that boat to sink!”, it is left to those survivors brave enough to speak out years later to tell the truth about this false flag attack from a supposed ally.
Not only was the US flag flying high and visible to the Israeli pilots that flew over the ship in the hours before the attack. It still flew during the torpedoing and the strafing of the survivors in the water by Israeli boats sent to ensure that no witnesses were left to tell their side of the story. Radio’s were jammed to prevent calls for help and everything was done to ensure that the boat sank as the US President wished.
However an Israeli pilot has gone on record to claim he told his superiors that the ship was clearly American but was threatened with court martial for not attacking it. He refused and was arrested when he returned to base.
Also US radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon heard the pilots protests and they have been confirmed by then U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter. As well as this an Israeli Major claimed that everyone in the war room at the time knew they were attacking a US ship. He had heard the pilots statement about the ship being American but he re-canted this statement after being threatened.
This false flag attack was obviously an attempt to bring the US into the war by blaming the attack on Egypt and it was only stopped due to the appearance of a Russian boat that halted the Israeli attack and prevented the plan from succeeding.
This is not exactly sticking up for Israel as many claim Alex Jones does and he could have easily skipped this event from his list of historical attacks. There have been so many false flag attacks throughout history he didn’t need to mention Israel and the USS Liberty at all. However he didn’t ignore it and even if he had it doesn’t matter.
What does matter is that people are made aware of the use of false flag attacks throughout history and how they are still taught at military schools and used to this day by those needing an excuse to go to war.
If anyone does now it is those with the highest security clearance in the land.
People who have clearance a lot higher than the Presidents and Prime Ministers of most countries put together. Trust me there are people with higher security clearances than the elected figurehead of your country.
Our permanent government, the heads of the civil service, the officials that seem to work for the government whatever party colour is in the White House that four year period.
The heads of the military and security agencies and their backers. People who remain in their position of power for decades – these are the people who would know. They are also unlikely to tell us if they did know.
Logically do I think we are the only planet in this huge universe with life.
No. The possibility seems too small.
Have we been visited by aliens?
If they exist and are more advanced than us then probably. They are probably the “Gods” from old tales and religious stories. If they only came recently they are the UFO’s people claim to see in the sky at night.
Those people who say that these alien visitors don’t make their presence known due to some Star Trek like law of the universe that forbids the interfering with lower species maybe on the right tract.
We are like ant colonies studied by David Attenborough and other naturalists who examine from afar, watch our lives and don’t interfere even when we fight each other to the death.
Those people who believe aliens are sitting in Area 51 maybe right and they maybe wrong but until someone admits what is going on there we won’t know.
There have been many people from high authority who have gone on record to say UFO‘s exist.
People such as the group of US nuclear missile commanders who gave a press conference the other year to say nuclear tests had been interfered with by UFO’s firing laser beams to stop the missiles from working.
I have a whole book at home full of witness statements from “believable” people who have gone on record to say they have seen UFO‘s in the sky the size of football pitches and even miles wide in the sky across the English channel.
These are not your average drunken farmer from Arizona who wakes up with a sore asshole after a gay encounter on the way home and makes up an alien probe story to cover himself.
No these are all RAF and USAF pilots, Army commanders and pilots from top class airliners who were all debriefed after their UFO encounter. All debriefed by people who took their claims seriously.
We can say that Area 51 is just a highly restricted training facility where top secret aircraft are designed and developed. Aircraft like the Blackbird, U2 spy plane and the stealth bomber.
However from the people who have put forward this explanation I have seen wondrous examples of anti-gravity devices, neutral balance planes lighter than air and other wondrous aircraft that anyone would think were alien in origin.
You can see them too in the documentary video at the bottom of this article.
The question is though, if these are all just top secret aircraft being tested. Where are they all?
Why are they not being used in our current wars?
Why has it taken over 50 years for certain airplanes to be developed but never deployed.
The Nazi’s were supposedly investigating anti gravity devices and that was back in the 40’s.
If these top secret fighter planes are being used they are not being used to help our solidiers in their current battles and if they are we are not being told about it.
Why are we still sending stealth fighters into war zones to be shot down by Chinese hackers who have given the details to their Serbian friends.
Why are our drones still so basic that even the Iranians can hack them and steal them on demand?
If Area 51 is full to the brim of top secret anti gravity devices that can fly at multiple times the speed of sound in seconds. Aircraft that can go from a stationary state to hundreds of mph in split seconds. Aircraft that make magnificent movements in the sky that would seem impossible then where are they all?
Why are we spending tax money developing them and not using them? Isn’t that a waste?
I don’t know if alien UFO technology is being deconstructed and reverse engineered at secret bases. Or that all our advancements in technology over the last half century have come from downed UFO’s.
I do know that the USA tried for the best part of a decade to get a novice hacker called Gary McKinnon extradited and imprisoned for life for claiming to find evidence of UFO’s at these bases.
Here was someone who used a basic port scanner and accessed top secret computers with open admin access (basically doing the USA a favour by showing how open their systems were) and claims to have found before and after photos which were touched up, having all signs of aliens and UFO’s removed from them, before they were given out to Universities and other places.
Why did the Americans try so hard to get this person into their custody? If he was just a crazy loon shouting into the wilderness why give him the credibility of trying so hard to get him into an orange jumpsuit.
Why wait years from the time of the “crime” until the UK changed their extradition laws with the US before making an extradition request.
Why were they so disgusted when our Home Secretary stood up to them for once and said she would not allow his extradition. Were they just pissed off that the UK stood up to them for once or was it the underlying reason they stood up to them the real cause of their outrage.
Why have so many UFO sightings occurred since the World Wars and the advancement of nuclear weaponry?
Are we just crazy for even believing their could be higher life forms in this massive universe OR are we crazy for NOT entertaining the idea that we are not alone in this empty space.
Here is Jesse Ventura looking into Area 51. A place you can be murdered without a warrant just for crossing an invisible line in the desert sand.
And here is Gary McKinnon explaining what he was searching for during his intrusion into Area 51 and what he claims to have found.
If you haven’t read my earlier piece UFO Chronicles: What the President doesn’t know then have a read as it contains lots more information about credible witnesses plus a documentary about why the UFO‘s story has been such a good distraction for the “people”.
View the original article Do Aliens exist at Area 51 on the main site www.darkpolitricks.com.
What happens to new Presidents to make them break all their campaign pledges?
By Dark Politricks
I’ve always thought that when a new President was elected that on their inauguration day, after all the celebrations, they were then taken into a special room within the White House.
In this room they would be shown tape recordings, videos, signed affidavits from witnesses and other materials that could be used to blackmail them. If at any time during their Presidency they they decided not follow the plans these puppet masters had already planned out for them then these materials would be used to bring them down.
I cannot think of any other reason why so many drunks, drug users, sex addicts and other deviants have been elected as President of the United States in recent years.
The last few Presidents have all had rumours about drugs, gay sex and even murders or drug importation.
People have come out and said that they were involved in sex acts with them, or pilots have recalled seeing the Bush brothers at an airport when dropping off blow after shipping arms down to Central America (Barry Seal).
Even the President’s themselves have admitted to taking drugs (whether they inhaled or not).
Of the latest three Presidents we have the following acts being attibuted to them by various investigators and witnesses. These are all acts that could be used to blackmail them.
Obama (coke, weed, gay sex, birth certificate, links to Islam)
George Bush (coke, drink, pot, gay sex in the White House)
Bill Clinton (coke importer, pot smoker – although he claims he didn’t inhale! Plus a string of dead people behind him, many who committed suicide with two gun shots to the head! And of course all the sexual acts and infidelity)
Lest you think I am being hypocritical I have no problem with drug use, gays or people following Islam (as long as they are not limiting womens rights, chopping hands off or blowing people up due to Allah’s will.) Murder on the other hand or importing drugs is of course another level altogether.
Plus we all know what the members of the secret society Skull n Bones have to do when they get initiated. Members who include many ex Presidents and powerful officials.
Apparently they lie naked in an open coffin and masturbate whilst the other members all stand around them watching and the new inmate recalls every sexual partner they have had. Whether this is true or not (it is a secret society) it would add many more Presidents to this list.
I have said this many times before, especially when it becomes apparent that the new President is going to break every election pledge they had promised the public on the campaign trail.
What happened to all the “hope and change” Obama promised us?
The end to wars, restoring our civil liberties, closing Gitmo, punishing the previous criminal occupants of the White House for their illegal wars and breaches of international treaties on war crime.
The only thing that could explain it is that either Obama just blatantly lied on the campaign trail or he was blackmailed into following a certain neo-con, pro-war, pro-Israeli, anti-civil liberty line once he was elected.
Apparently 3 out of 10 men are homosexual yet there are hardly any openly gay members of Congress. Why is that? Is the Congress somehow different from the rest of society or is it full of people who have hidden lives and risk exposure at any moment by someone with enough power to expose their hypocrisy?
I just got sent this recording of Bill Hicks on Twitter and I think he sums it up perfectly. As I always say – satire and comedy is sometimes the only way reality can be conveyed to the public without getting a bullet in your head for doing so.
View the original article “Are new Presidents blackmailed to make them break all their campaign pledges?” at www.darkpolitricks.com
I like most people like to think that I am rational and behave based on logic and reason rather than pure emotion. I don’t believe an article or a video I find on the web just because someone says it is true and I try to make my own mind up about things whether or not that pleases people by fitting in with established opinion.
Therefore when I watched Charlie Veitch of the Love Police on the BBC3 documentary the other night have a change of heart about his previously held beliefs about 9.11 being a conspiracy theory I had to respect him for putting emotion aside and having the balls to be non hypocritical by using logic and reason when presented with various “experts” who showed:
-How easy it was for a person who had never previously flown a plane to fly a Cessna and land it.
-How a demolitions expert explained about the collapse of the Twin Towers. How steel didn’t need to melt only weaken to lose support and collapse into it’s own footprints.
-How a “scientist” showed the weakness of Thermite in burning through metal beams.
-How a receiver of a phone call from one of the passengers from Flight 93 told about her last moments with her son.
All very emotional stuff and for the bits that were shown a reasonable person could quite easily take on board the evidence presented and go away with a changed mind like Charlie has done.
However the documentary was more important for all those tricky questions that have still not been sufficiently answered in the decade since that horrific event that started an endless war of terror.
There was also no mention of the history of false flag attacks and how the CIA, Mossad, MI6, ISI etc have perpetrated crimes of this nature for the past 50+ years.
There was no mention of the Israeli spy ring following the hijackers around the country, living doors away and of the dancing Israelis caught following orders to “document the event” that were arrested in the hours after the attack.
There was no talk of the ABLE Danger program that had identified the 9.11 hijackers months before the attack occurred and the other warnings given by foreign intelligence as well as domestic agencies.
There was no talk about the ISI chief who had ordered the wiring of money to the lead hijacker who was meeting with top US military and intelligence figures on the day of the attack.
There was no talk about the war games that were scheduled for the same day that confused air traffic controllers who didn’t know whether the hijacked planes were part of a training exercise or real. Who picked that day for war games that mimicked the exact same simulated attacks using multiple hijacked planes? Was that just pure co-incidence?
There was certainly no mention of the odd piece of behaviour by a mastermind terrorist who had previously claimed responsibility for attacks on US assets such as the embassy bombings or the US Cole but denied all knowledge or involvement in the planning and execution of the attacks of 9.11 in an interview carried less than a month later. The biggest and most successful terrorist attack in the world and not one terrorist group actually claimed responsibility for it as they do in all other attacks that supposedly push their agenda into the public sphere.
There was certainly no mention of all the faked Bin Laden tapes and videos that have been released at key moments in the US election cycle and which have been verified by both independent experts and intelligence agencies as being fake.
There wasn’t an interview with Boeing who’s plane reportedly hit the Pentagon flying at 400mph only 30ft from the ground. A feat many aircraft engineers including some I know personally claim would be impossible due to the amount of down-force created by the plane and according to Gordon Duff he has already gained statements from Boeing denying that this feat could be accomplished by such as large plane.
There was no talk about the lack of a proper criminal investigation into the evidence at ground zero. How critical pieces of evidence no longer exist as they were carted off in private security firm vans never to be seen again. Anybody wanting to carry out a proper investigation now would be starting from a very hard position as all the physical evidence has been destroyed.
There was no talk about the actual 9.11 inquiry about how it was used to build a case for war with a country totally uninvolved with the attacks e.g Iraq and how the White House blocked certain questions from being asked, hid key witnesses and used scare tactics to prevent certain witnesses from testifying. There was certainly no mention of the 6 commissioners who have made comments suggesting at the the very least the full truth has not been revealed and that a new inquiry is needed to get to the truth.
I like Charlie and I like what he did with the Love Police and I never knew his background as a drone city boy turned soldier and potential Iraqi war victim or torturer until he discovered questions surrounding 9.11. He seems to have changed his mind back from a conspiratorial view to the official position of bad intelligence and bad communication added to a lot of luck by the terrorists.
Believe it or not I am not someone who wants there to be a conspiracy surrounding 9.11 and I am perfectly happy if a new proper independent inquiry into the events of the day that covered everything showed it to be just as the official story says.
However we have not had a proper criminal investigation or inquiry with subpoena power and we know the only inquiry held so far was a farce so until that event occurs I am going to have questions that remain unanswered and I will keep on asking them until I gain a satisfactory answer.
This does not necessarily mean that each question doesn’t have a perfectly logical and legitimate explanation behind it but until they are answered I am going to continue to want a full explanation that explains all the oddities and weird science.
National security is no excuse for hiding the truth when it comes to the events of 9.11 and as we have seen how both the UK and USA has eroded civil liberties by the bucket load, turned airports into a choice between a porno grope or a virtual strip search and we are constantly at war with an enemy that cannot logically be beaten.
This means the questions surrounding the events that have caused all this panic and fear and lined the pockets of the military industrial complex by the bucket load as well as making torture, extraordinary rendition and prison without trial a norm a question that demands a full answer and nothing less should suffice.
If you believe the official story then you should still demand a new inquiry just so these questions can be answered and the conspiracy theorists might quieten down a bit but until these important questions are answered there will always be sites like this asking them and getting up your nose.
We cannot let another 10 years pass without the war on terror coming to an end and the questions of 9.11 being put to bed once and for all.
Let me know what you think about the events by answering my poll below.
A new video has been released that shows the missile / plane hitting the Pentagon on 9.11.
The video is shot at a higher angle and I don’t know why it has taken this long to be released or if it has why I have not come across it before seeing it on an interview Gordon Duff did with Press TV the other week.
It seems very odd that someone would have this kind of very important footage and decide to keep it to themselves for so long.
I want to know the details of who shot it, why they didn’t release it earlier and what kind of links they have to either the government or anti-government pro 9.11 Truth groups, maybe they have none to either.
I have no way of verfifying whether it is real or not but it certainly looks real and it sure beats the only other previous video we have been shown from a Pentagon CCTV camera.
It seems strange that it comes on the 10th annivesary of the 9.11 attacks and it is either some kind of set-up or very weird co-incidence that a video of this magnitude would appear at this time.
A time that we have been supposedly fighting al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen whilst helping them beat an ex ally to become rulers and possessors of all Col Gaddafi’s military hardware, billions of cash and stockpile of WMD including enough poison gas to kill most London tube travellers.
Ten years of a rising Police State at home, a massive loss of liberties and for travellers a chance of a free sexual encounter with the TSA. And who can forget the “assassination” of Bin Laden where no photos before he was shot were released from the SEALS helmet cameras and of course his quick burial at sea like Blackbeard.
Nothing to see here, we’ve only just killed the person supposedly responsible for the last 10 years of war. Unlike the capture of Saddam Hussein there was no parade in front of cameras of the captured enemy and no glorified photos to show the world that the USA had finally succeeded in their decade old mission to hunt down the big bad bogey man.
Even the Liberal Democrats, the supposed protectors of freedom and liberty and the only main party in the UK that was officially against the Iraq war – supported the “humanitarian” intervention on one side of a civil war in an oil rich country and reneged on the only decent part of their manifesto that I actually supported e.g their Freedom Bill that became a “Heres some things we don’t mind you do” bill.
Literally the guts were ripped from the bill and smeared across the floor of parliament in a great show of disdain to all supporters of their hypocritical power hungry party that took their pieces of silver, ministers cars and luxury travel in return for all their principles and any future hope of a student voting for them.
So the 10 year anniversary of 9.11 is going to bring out a lot of documentaries discussing the day’s events and I can well imagine some of those straw men hit pieces the BBC like to do about “conspiracy theories” being the realm of loons and crazies as if ex Mossad Spies who freely admit carrying them out as official policy for Israel are just figments of our imagination.
So a video of this importance being released just before the anniversary is suspicious in my mind to say the least purely as I want to know why I and others haven’t seen it before.
There maybe a purely innocent explaination for this release but it is no lie to say that the 9.11 Truth movement has grown from strength to strength and during the ten years since that day the number of people who doubt the official story in at least one way has grown in the millions.
So this video of a plane or a missile hitting the Pentagon is a big event and we must remember that the Oxford definition of a missile is this:
an object which is forcibly propelled at a target, either by hand or from a mechanical weapon.
a weapon that is self-propelled or directed by remote control, carrying conventional or nuclear explosive.
Therefore a plane of any shape or size that was remotely or automatically controlled rather than flown by a pilot would in my mind at least count as a missile. This technology to fly a plane by remote control existed way before 9.11.
This is supposedly a big Boeing 757 plane that Gordon Duff claims he has spoken to people from Boeing that have reportedly claimed that a plane of that size would not be able to fly that fast and that low to the ground saying:
“We have engineers at Boeing the company that manufactured the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon that say it couldn’t fly that fast, it can’t fly that low, it can’t make those turns and it couldn’t have been there,”
We also have the size of the hole left in the building.
Notice that there are no wing markings either side of the hole at all.
Even if the wings fell off of crunched up into infinity they would still have left some form of marking against the wall as they first hit the building. Even if it was just a dusty mark the length of a Boeing 757 wing but we find no such markings.
Notice how clean the walls are either side of the nice round hole in the first floor where wing marks should be. Not even a piece of brick dust out of place.
We also have the issue of falsified or real altitude data from the NTSB which has been analysed and shows a discrepancy in the height of Flight 757 at the time of its approach.
If the data is to be believed then the actual aircraft altitude was 300 feet higher than claimed and the plane didn’t hit the Pentagon. You can find details over at http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html which has a detailed analysis of the flight recorder data.
This means either the data released to the public was falsified and someone left a mistake in by accident (or maybe they were sending a clue OR a big “fuck you”) or the actual plane flew over the building.
It certainly cannot mean that the plane hit the first floor. A Boeing 757 plane of this size supposedly flew at 400mph and only 30ft above the ground hitting the Pentagon as you can see from the photo at the very bottom of the first floor.
Whatever you believe about the 9.11 attacks and the attack at the Pentagon we now have another piece of the picture to slot in to all the other recently released videos and tape recordings.
We have witnesses prepared to testify who can’t and senior government figures ready to go public about what they know of the Bush Cheney axis of evil. The question is will we ever live to see the day when a proper inquiry into the attacks of 9.11 ever happens?
Every year the Bilderberg conference in which globalists and the political elite meet up to discuss their plans for the coming months gets more and more coverage.
Once it was just another conspiracy theory that could be dismissed out of hand by people with no knowledge of the truth but now because of the internet and the increasing power and reach of alternative media it has broken through into the mainstream.
No-one can now deny the existence of the Bilderbergers or decry discussion of their intentions as just baseless speculation as for the very first time the alternative media has joined forces to do the job that our papers, news channels and mainstream media should have done.
Apart from the Guardian, who have as usual let Charlie Skelton do the majority of their coverage, and a few other whitewash pieces this year has been no different from the rest in the lack of coverage by the mainstream media. However what has been different is that this year the alternative media have really picked up the slack in the lack of coverage and for once it really seems that the globalists have been on the back foot.
Alex Jones, WeAreChange, the Watson brothers and all the others have done such a good job at reporting on the meeting getting video feeds, interviews, photographs and great scoops about the male prostitutes and globalist plans for the year that it has become clear that when our bought and paid for media deserts us citizen journalism can, and will, look them in the eye and say “well if you won’t report on this story, we will”.
Questions are starting to be asked in parliaments all over the globe about various politicians attendance at the Bilderberg meeting. We most certainly have a right to know what is being discussed when we as tax payers are footing the bill for our officials jets and hotel stays.
When the person responsible for implementing one of the most severe austerity measures in the Western world is meeting with the heads of international banking and business we have a right to know what promises were made and what plans have been discussed.
Peter Mandelson is no longer in government and whilst the Lord keeps regular attendance at these yearly meetings it is only right we ask in who’s capacity is he attending and what kind of power or influence does he now wield to be of use to the other members.
Maybe he is just going to meet up with friends or to enjoy the country walks. Or maybe he is going because even though he is not in government he is still able to make things happen and if that is the case then I for one would love to know what and who’s strings he can pull and how.
Our media is zipped up tight on all of these questions and we hear that the Bilderbergs have been busy getting Rupert Murdoch to crush any form of dissent and to keep it that way.
Thank god the internet is still at least partially free from censorship and control otherwise we would never hear that our leaders plan to expand the wars in the Middle East and to keep the price of oil high whilst milking all the social media sites for as much useful data as possible.
It is only through people with links to Bilderberg insiders like Jim Tucker that we find out about the plans for the coming years and whilst our newspapers roll over and play dead it is heartening to see that the alternative media is all too able to fill the void.
Apparently the Bilderberg attendees are horrified at the amount of coverage they have been getting this year and it has only been through the efforts of people all too happy to wear the label conspiracy theorist only to brush it off without a care and prove their detractors wrong with photos and hard evidence that this has happened.
We shall have to wait and see how successful the Bilderberg plans for 2011-2012 will be. One thing is for sure and that is the age of secrecy for the secretive group is hopefully over and it is only through proper scrutiny of their discussions that their plans can be thwarted.
Dark Politics is a site dedicated to reporting on the darker side of politics including the war on terror, the high tech police state, privacy and Internet freedom as well as civil rights, freedom of speech and social justice.
Please visit the main site www.darkpolitricks.com for the latest news, more articles, cool features and much more.
Dark Politics 