What we know about 9.11 ten years on

By Dark Politricks

I like most people like to think that I am rational and behave based on logic and reason rather than pure emotion. I don’t believe an article or a video I find on the web just because someone says it is true and I try to make my own mind up about things whether or not that pleases people by fitting in with established opinion.

Therefore when I watched Charlie Veitch of the Love Police on the BBC3 documentary the other night have a change of heart about his previously held beliefs about 9.11 being a conspiracy theory I had to respect him for putting emotion aside and having the balls to be non hypocritical by using logic and reason when presented with various “experts” who showed:

-How easy it was for a person who had never previously flown a plane to fly a Cessna and land it.

-How a demolitions expert explained about the collapse of the Twin Towers. How steel didn’t need to melt only weaken to lose support and collapse into it’s own footprints.

-How a “scientist” showed the weakness of Thermite in burning through metal beams.

-How a receiver of a phone call from one of the passengers from Flight 93 told about her last moments with her son.

All very emotional stuff and for the bits that were shown a reasonable person could quite easily take on board the evidence presented and go away with a changed mind like Charlie has done.

However the documentary was more important for all those tricky questions that have still not been sufficiently answered in the decade since that horrific event that started an endless war of terror.

There was no mention of WTC-7 at all, the building not hit by a plane that fell at free-fall speed for 2.5 seconds, that witnesses claim to have heard a countdown preceding the collapse as well as the sound and flashes of cutter charges.

There was also no mention of the history of false flag attacks and how the CIA, Mossad, MI6, ISI etc have perpetrated crimes of this nature for the past 50+ years.

There was no mention of the Israeli spy ring following the hijackers around the country, living doors away and of the dancing Israelis caught following orders to “document the event” that were arrested in the hours after the attack.

There was no talk of the ABLE Danger program that had identified the 9.11 hijackers months before the attack occurred and the other warnings given by foreign intelligence as well as domestic agencies.

There was no talk about the ISI chief who had ordered the wiring of money to the lead hijacker who was meeting with top US military and intelligence figures on the day of the attack.

There was no talk about the war games that were scheduled for the same day that confused air traffic controllers who didn’t know whether the hijacked planes were part of a training exercise or real.  Who picked that day for war games that mimicked the exact same simulated attacks using multiple hijacked planes?  Was that just pure co-incidence?

There was no mention of the witnesses who have come forward to say that they heard explosions at the ground floor of WTC or who claim that they know flight 93 was shot down by US Air force or the many witnesses like Sibel Edmonds who have been gagged and prevented from telling what they know about the links between the USA and Bin Laden’s al-Qaeda.

There was certainly no mention of the odd piece of behaviour by a mastermind terrorist who had previously claimed responsibility for attacks on US assets such as the embassy bombings or the US Cole but denied all knowledge or involvement in the planning and execution of the attacks of 9.11 in an interview carried less than a month later. The biggest and most successful terrorist attack in the world and not one terrorist group actually claimed responsibility for it as they do in all other attacks that supposedly push their agenda into the public sphere.

There was certainly no mention of all the faked Bin Laden tapes and videos that have been released at key moments in the US election cycle and which have been verified by both independent experts and intelligence agencies as being fake.

There wasn’t an interview with Boeing who’s plane reportedly hit the Pentagon flying at 400mph only 30ft from the ground. A feat many aircraft engineers including some I know personally claim would be impossible due to the amount of down-force created by the plane and according to Gordon Duff he has already gained statements from Boeing denying that this feat could be accomplished by such as large plane.

There was no talk about the lack of a proper criminal investigation into the evidence at ground zero. How critical pieces of evidence no longer exist as they were carted off in private security firm vans never to be seen again. Anybody wanting to carry out a proper investigation now would be starting from a very hard position as all the physical evidence has been destroyed.

There was no talk about the actual 9.11 inquiry about how it was used to build a case for war with a country totally uninvolved with the attacks e.g Iraq and how the White House blocked certain questions from being asked, hid key witnesses and used scare tactics to prevent certain witnesses from testifying. There was certainly no mention of the 6 commissioners who have made comments suggesting at the the very least the full truth has not been revealed and that a new inquiry is needed to get to the truth.

I like Charlie and I like what he did with the Love Police and I never knew his background as a drone city boy turned soldier and potential Iraqi war victim or torturer until he discovered questions surrounding 9.11. He seems to have changed his mind back from a conspiratorial view to the official position of bad intelligence and bad communication added to a lot of luck by the terrorists.

Believe it or not I am not someone who wants there to be a conspiracy surrounding 9.11 and I am perfectly happy if a new proper independent inquiry into the events of the day that covered everything showed it to be just as the official story says.

However we have not had a proper criminal investigation or inquiry with subpoena power and we know the only inquiry held so far was a farce so until that event occurs I am going to have questions that remain unanswered and I will keep on asking them until I gain a satisfactory answer.

This does not necessarily mean that each question doesn’t have a perfectly logical and legitimate explanation behind it but until they are answered I am going to continue to want a full explanation that explains all the oddities and weird science.

National security is no excuse for hiding the truth when it comes to the events of 9.11 and as we have seen how both the UK and USA has eroded civil liberties by the bucket load, turned airports into a choice between a porno grope or a virtual strip search and we are constantly at war with an enemy that cannot logically be beaten.

This means the questions surrounding the events that have caused all this panic and fear and lined the pockets of the military industrial complex by the bucket load as well as making torture, extraordinary rendition and prison without trial a norm a question that demands a full answer and nothing less should suffice.

If you believe the official story then you should still demand a new inquiry just so these questions can be answered and the conspiracy theorists might quieten down a bit but until these important questions are answered there will always be sites like this asking them and getting up your nose.

We cannot let another 10 years pass without the war on terror coming to an end and the questions of 9.11 being put to bed once and for all.

Let me know what you think about the events by answering my poll below.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , ,

One Response to “What we know about 9.11 ten years on”

  1. Edward Murphy Says:

    The beauty of this scenario, ‘The War On Terrror’, is that it is open-ended, a situation which is without end, supplying levels of threat which cannot be proven as being justified, purely by the fact that the intelligence, garnered from various sources, cannot be divulged as it would (allegedly) endanger the suppliers of this same intelligence, so complete secrecy is imposed.
    God only knows where this is going to lead, but it will be very unpleasant, and ruinously costly, especially during these harsh economic times.
    Still, what’s wrong with relinquishing some freedoms for “guaranteed” security?
    Well, Benjamin Franklin stated that any society that gives up their hard won freedoms for the promise of security deserve neither, and a truer word was never written, or spoken.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: